What Up My Cool Crypids

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
thementalistscandidate
thementalistscandidate
winternymphaea

image
image

heaven gaia spring/summer 2o21

sagasandtales

This looks less usable than court clothes, and that is saying a lot.

marypsue

#clothes should be useable

All due respect, but I’ve gotta disagree and vehemently. If the standard you’re measuring runway fashion against is the same standard you’re measuring Walmart jeans against, that’s basically the same as applying the same standards of quality to visual art versus literature. They’re two different things with two different goals. Off-the-rack clothing should be usable, yes, and a lot of it isn’t these days, especially for women, and that’s an issue. But it’s a separate issue.

Runway fashion isn’t for using. Runway fashion is more sculptural art than anything.

(Which is why it pisses me off so unbelievably much that fashion houses are now using AI to create runway looks. That’s like ‘the world’s biggest virtual-reality Cinnabon!’ it’s just pixels you can make it any size you want you don’t have to bake it I am not impressed. Anyone can digitally illustrate a physically-impossible dress. Now, that bitch who did the whole line of ‘glitch’ dresses where one was upside-down on the model and one was a foot to the left and one was clipping through her horizontally but all of them kept the shape of A Dress Someone Is Wearing? And actually made those dresses in meatspace? That’s fucking artwork.

Not to mention that I actually respect the people who take the time to digitally illustrate an impossible dress. It’s just a different art form than sculpture! Which is what these fashion houses are trying to claim theirs is! Which is why they’re a pack of spoiled douchebags and we should eat their kneecaps!)

But I digress. There are many important criticisms to be levelled at runway fashion, but ‘it’s impractical to wear in real life’ is not one that I find meaningful. It’s not meant to be worn in real life (except maybe to a one-night, once-in-a-lifetime awards show event). Yeah, it’s gonna look stupid and get in the way if you try to wear that out into the garden to pull weeds, because that’s not what it’s for, any more than the Elgin marbles are meant to be used as doorstops. It’s showing off what fabric can be made to do. It’s textile sculpture.

marzipanandminutiae

also like this is an important history lesson too

because court gowns/ball gowns/other historical formalwear? also not meant to be worn in real life

“oh I can’t imagine how dirty that train would get! how do you walk around in such intense panniers?! that ruff is so impractical!”

yeah, they’re meant for standing around looking pretty in specific, brief cirmustances. indoors usually, or outdoors with some barrier between Skirt and Ground

our ancestors weren’t stupid. situational clothing has always been a thing

thementalistscandidate
shamebats

ID: Tweet by Ilhan Omar, linking to an article titled "Kansas' extreme new anti-trans bill could see some cis women banned from toilets" with the reply: "wtf: Definitions outlined in the bill also state a female is a person who produces "ova" - in other words, eggs - meaning cis women who are infertile and are unable to produce eggs coul be barred from spaces under the legislation's legal terms. /end IDALT
ID screenshot of a Reddit comment by /u/FrenchTantan: Ok but hang on, does the bill say "produce"? 'Cause if I remember my biology lessons properly, people with ovaries don't produce eggs after they're born, ever. They're born with a limited set that decreases starting puberty. If the bill is actually phrased that way, that's even funnier (and also sad and stupid)  Edit: The bill actually says  "whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova" so yeah. That's nobody except fetuses lmao. Like, not even the person who's pregnant since it's not their reproductive system /end IDALT

This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, how the fuck would you even enforce that?

"Oh want to use the bathroom? I'll just need you to produce an egg real quick".

Reddit thread

aloeverawrites

Chicken only bathrooms. Not the animal rights move we wanted-

shamebats

Chicken sitting on eggsALT
Dove sitting on eggsALT
Lizard with eggsALT
Platypus with eggsALT

POV: you (human) (not a fetus) have illegally entered a public women's bathroom in Kansas

traycakes

It's impossible to define woman in a way that excludes all trans women and doesn't exclude any cis women, but defining women in a way that excludes all human women trans or cis is a pretty amazing fuckup.

daughter-of-sapph0

image
nocaps27spaces
phoenixyfriend

Pour one out for all the stories you'll never find again, that you barely remember in totality, but that left an impression on you that you'll never forget.

The short stories from standardized tests that you only had a few minutes to read, but those minutes will last a lifetime.

The books on the library display shelf you used to occupy time until your mom could come pick you up from school.

The graphic novel you picked up when you were first getting into comics and could never find again.

The single lines or themes from stories you otherwise don't remember, save for the one thing that you saw and internalized as a new part of your personality.

Let's pour one out for the books that built us, even if we never could find them again, and couldn't of we wanted to.